podsumowanie:

Kosovka 2008.08.15 [12:03]
Ау. Масонски утицај или?

mikica 2007.03.30 [18:30]
+++++

igors 2006.11.09 [15:54]
!!!!

marina 2006.08.30 [00:39]

mihaela 2006.08.29 [20:25]
yes!

marina 2006.08.29 [20:15]
:))
we do not miss that
everyone finds what he wont to know :)
but there are many people who do not wont to know :((((((

mihaela 2006.08.29 [20:07]
what is missing here is someone with very good theological knowledge!

mihaela 2006.08.29 [20:06]
yes, Marina, I said what is missing here, I meant on our site :)

marina 2006.08.29 [19:57]
there is nothing missing, but theologicaly wrong
xml already sed why !!!
First Person of Holy Trinity was not seen by any man, never. (That is written in Saint Scripture)
Dove is symbol of Holy Spirit (Third Person of Holy Trinity)


Бога нико никад није видео, једино Син његов, он Га објави
нисам баш лепо цитирала Свето Писмо
Али оно каже да смо само Сина видели и њега можемо сликати на иконама. Голуб иначе изображава Светог Духа

mihaela 2006.08.29 [19:49]
what is missing here is someone with very good theological knowledge to explain what is wrong with some icons like this one.
the photo is very nice, but regarding the icon I agree with xml

As I know the only icon officially accepted with Holy Trinity is the one with the three angels that were received by Avraam and Sara. See it here:

http://www.orthphoto.net/photo.php?id=7516

Dejan Orelj 2006.08.23 [11:28]

zidan2703 2006.08.22 [10:33]

Andrei 2006.08.21 [23:31]

nenadkosovac 2006.08.20 [22:06]

Haydamak 2006.08.20 [18:11]

petela 2006.08.20 [13:56]

Adam Falkowski 2006.08.20 [13:24]

Zoran Sremski 2006.08.20 [13:06]

lektor 2006.08.20 [12:09]

agaf1 2006.08.20 [11:58]

Bojan 2006.08.20 [10:37]

b.backovic 2006.08.20 [07:08]

xml 2006.08.20 [06:35]
theological tragedy is to show unseen First Person of Holy Trinity.

dragoj03 2006.08.19 [23:52]