podsumowanie:

maksim 2010.01.09 [21:26]

ketevanbd 2009.04.20 [21:57]
ХРИСТОС ВОСКРЕСЕ!!!

Bojan 2006.10.08 [00:37]

agaf1 2005.12.29 [19:03]

Adam Z 2005.10.15 [12:41]

Lekovicl 2005.10.09 [12:38]
Hi my brother Sergei, you have right. Everyting depend of person. My intention was to sad that all of us here on "Ortphoto" trying to learn something and to have some friendly comunication with people who have same interest for photoart and Orthodox faith. It is not any benefit if you just give bad mark and that is all. We need explanation to learn something. For example you allways give some comment even when you dont think that photo deserve mark ;o) God bless you!
Lazar

Sergei 2005.10.08 [19:33]
Lazar, good evening!
Certainly, in any case it's better to have got an explanation if not a good mark has been put. But at the same time a person who writes a comment is not obliged to explain his mark by all means. It depends upon the person himself. One matter is logic and quite another matter's a will of a person.

Lekovicl 2005.10.08 [00:28]
PS. and Ioann if you do not allow marks for your photos than you in my opinion should not give marks and specialy nost so bad

Lekovicl 2005.10.08 [00:20]
I just want ot say to brother Ioann that hi shoud give some explanation whan hi give bad mark

mirakulos 2005.10.07 [19:39]

marina 2005.10.07 [09:06]

Anoczka 2005.10.06 [19:07]

ioann 2005.10.06 [11:56]

Crna Gora 2005.10.06 [00:11]
it is like in churches in Serbia and Crna Gora

panfilukp 2005.10.05 [21:41]

mala 2005.10.05 [19:12]

bogdan 2005.10.05 [17:12]

!tomo! 2005.10.05 [16:05]

daria 2005.10.05 [15:31]

Salomakin O 2005.10.05 [15:18]

Sergei 2005.10.05 [12:56]
Hi, Sergei!
The picture of the fragment of the inner decoration of the cathedral is rather dark. Very likely, this cathedral on the inside is illuminated from the top by the natural light only.
Your own commentary's very interesting and cognitive.
Without mark.

czarna owca 2005.10.05 [12:50]