podsumowanie:

Boris_SZ 2010.02.12 [08:26]

Andreea 2008.09.14 [13:00]

Ana 2008.02.12 [13:45]

mroberts 2007.10.26 [20:26]
I agree with you both. Maybe I shouldn't have labeled it an "icon." I thought it was a pretty interesting piece of art, esp. how it turned out after photographing. Thanks for the comments.

kalpak 2007.10.25 [14:48]
I agree with "codre". Our - orthodox - art intends not to express sentiment, but to lift us in the heights (to meet God, of course, and to know what is really real). That is what one means with "opposition with pathetic" and so on. Therefore we stress the Resurrection more than the Cross. Or better to say, the Cross, but only through the Resurrection.

кетеван 2007.10.25 [10:28]

hmiodrag 2007.10.25 [09:53]

codre 2007.10.25 [08:54]
I GIVE YOU 10 FOR THAT YOU GIVE ME OCASION TO TRANSLATE THIS NOT FOR FOTO (1-1-1)

TI-AM DAT 10 PENTRU CA MI-AI DAT OCAZIA SA TRADUC CE E MAI JOS, DAR PENTRU FOTO NOTA E: 1-1-1

codre 2007.10.25 [08:52]
"The ICON make opposition with pathetical and sentimental manifestation, with romantic spirit, trough a kind of hierati indifference and ascetic denudation of his structure"
Paul Evdokimov

I GIVE YOU 10 FOR THAT YOU GIVE ME OCASION TO TRANSLATE THIS NOT FOR FOTO (1-1-1)

codre 2007.10.25 [08:50]
"Icoana se opune acelor manifestari patetice si sentimentale, acelor acorduri specifice spiritului romantic, printr-o anumita indiferenta hieratica si dezgolire ascetica a facturii sale"
Paul Evdokimov

AleksaSrbin 2007.10.25 [07:19]

maria 2007.10.25 [06:27]

Dusan Dan 2007.10.24 [22:44]

irenalozowik 2007.10.24 [22:29]

bmimv 2007.10.24 [22:14]

b.backovic 2007.10.24 [21:39]

zhelach 2007.10.24 [21:34]

Isa 2007.10.24 [21:16]

alexandru 2007.10.24 [21:03]